Select Page

Table 15.8 Midazolam for the Acute Management of Intracranial Pressure Post ABI

Author Year

Country

Research Design

PEDro

Sample Size

Methods Outcomes

Ghori et al. (2008)

Ireland

RCT

PEDro=8

N=30

Population: TBI; Midazolam (MDZ, n=15): Age Range: 18-65 yr; Gender: Male=14, Female=1; Mean Time Since Injury=12.86 hr; Median GCS=4.73. Propofol (PROP, n=13): Age Range: 18-65 yr; Gender: Male=13, Female=0; Mean Time Since Injury=9.07 hr; Median GCS=5.07.

Intervention: Patients were randomly allocated to receive MDZ (n=15) or PROP (n=13) sedation. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and 3 mo.

Outcome Measures: Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS), Mortality, Disability.

1.        There was no significant difference between MDZ and PROP groups in number of patients with good outcomes (53% versus 54%).

2.        Of the patients who had a poor outcome, there was no significant difference in the mortality rate between MDZ and PROP groups (20% versus 38%; p=0.07).

3.        Of the patients who had a poor outcome, there was no significant difference in the severe disability rate between MDZ and PROP groups (20% versus 15%; p=0.8).

Sanchez-Izquierdo-Riera et al. (1998)

Spain

RCT

PEDro=5

N=100

Population: TBI; Mean Age=35.4 yr; Gender: Male=75, Female=25.

Intervention: Patients were randomized to receive continuous intravenous infusion of midazolam (0.1-0.35 mg/kg/hr,n=34), propofol at 1.5- 6mg/kg/hr (n=33), or propofol at 0.1-0.2 mg/kg/hr (n=33). All patients received morphine.

Outcome Measures: Intracranial Pressure (ICP), Cerebral Perfusion Pressure (CPP), Triglyceride levels, Wake-up time, Sedation.

1.        No significant differences were found in ICP or CPP among treatment groups.

2.        High levels of triglyceride were found in patients receiving propofol (p<0.05).

3.        Wake-up time was significantly shorter in patients receiving propofol compared to those receiving midazolam (110 min/190 min versus 660 min, p<0.01).

4.        All regimens achieved similar levels of sedation and had similar incidences of adverse effects.

Davis et al. (2001)

USA

Case Series

N=184

 

Population: TBI; Northern Cohort (n=66): Mean Age=32.9 yr; Gender: Male=53, Female=13. Southern Cohort (n=118): Mean Age=31.2 yr; Gender: Male=89, Female=29.

Intervention: Patients received 0.1 mg/kg midazolam without a restricted maximal dose (Group 1) or with a maximal dose of 5 mg (Group 2).

Outcome Measures: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Hypotension, Dose.

1.        Patients in the Group 1 received significantly higher doses than those in Group 2 (0.106 mg/kg versus 0.059mg/kg, p<0.0001).

2.        A significant relationship was found between dose and hypotension following intubation (p=0.032) as well as decrease in SBP (p=0.022).

Papazian et al. (1993)

France

Case Series

N=12

Population: TBI; Mean Age=28.3 yr; Gender: Male=11, Female=1; Mean GCS=5.2.

Intervention: Patients received intravenous infusion of 0.15 mg/kg midazolam over a 1min period.

Outcome Measures: Intracranial Pressure (ICP), Cerebral Perfusion Pressure (CPP), Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP).

1.        Significant reductions in MAP (89 mmHg to 75 mmHg, p<0.0001) and CPP (71 mmHg to 55.8 mmHg, p<0.0001) were observed, but not in ICP.

2.        Patients with low initial ICP (<18 mmHg) experienced greater reductions in MAP and greater increases in ICP compared to those with high initial ICP (≥18 mmHg; p<0.0001).

Multimodal Midazolam Interventions

Stewart et al.

(1994)

UK

PCT

N=15

Population: ABI; Propofol (PROP, n=9): Mean Age=30.5 yr; Gender: Male=8, Female=1; Severity of Injury: Moderate=2, Severe=7; Morphine and Midazolam (M+M, n=6): Mean Age=30.5 yr; Gender: Male=6, Female=0; Severity of Injury: Moderate=1, Severe=5.

Intervention: Patients received sedation with either PROP (150-400 mg/hr) or morphine (0-4 mg/hr) with midazolam (0-5 mg/hr).

Outcome Measures: Intracranial Pressure (ICP), Cerebral Perfusion Pressure (CPP), Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP), Global Brain Metabolism (AVDO2), Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS).

1.        PROP led to a decrease in AVDO2 at 4 hr (6.0±2.6 mL/dL to 3.0±0.6 mL/dL, p<0.02).

2.        No difference was reported between groups in ICP, CPP, and MAP.

3.        No difference was reported between groups in functional outcomes on GOS at 6mo.