Select Page

Table 8.28 Anger Management Interventions for the Treatment of Anger Post ABI

Author

Year

Country

Research Design

PEDro

Sample Size

Methods Outcome

Hart et al.

(2017)

USA

RCT

PEDro=7

NStart=90, NEnd=84

Population: TBI; Severity: Severe. Treatment Group (n=60): Mean Age=30.4yr; Gender: Male=49, Female=11; Median Time Post Injury=69mo. Control Group (n=30): Mean Age=36.2yr; Gender: Male=24, Female=6; Median Time Post Injury=72mo.

Intervention: Participants were randomized to receive anger self-management training (treatment) or personal readjustment and education (control) in 90min weekly sessions for 8wk. Assessments were conducted at baseline, 4wk, 8wk, and 16wk.

Outcome Measure: State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory 2 (STAXI-2); Brief Anger-Aggression Questionnaire (BAAQ).

1.          At 8wk, the proportion of responders on self-reported STAXI-2 Trait Anger was significantly greater in the treatment group than control group for intention-to-treat analysis (68.3% versus 46.7%, p=0.047) and per protocol analysis (71.9% versus 51.9%, p=0.031); these improvements were maintained at 16wk.

2.          There were no significant differences in response rates between groups on self-reported STAXI-2 Anger Expression-Out or BAAQ at 8wk or 16wk.

3.          There were no significant differences in response rates between groups on STAXI-2 or BAAQ as rated by a significant other at 8wk or 16wk.

4.          There were no significant differences between groups in mean scores on STAXI-2 or BAAQ by self-report over time.

Aboulafia-Brakha et al.

(2016)

Switzerland

RCT

NInitial=24, NFinal=19

Population: ABI: TBI=15, Stroke=4; Gender: Male=16, Female=3; Mean GCS=7.8; Intervention Group (N=8): Mean Age=46.1yr; Mean Time Post Injury=12.7mo; Control Group (N=11): Mean Age=39.3yr; Mean Time Post Injury=19.45mo

Intervention: Patients self-reporting increased anger were randomized to one of two groups (AB or BA). The AB group received an 8-wk anger management programme (60 min, 1x/wk), followed by a 4wk psycho-educational programme. For group BA, the order was reversed. Outcomes were assessed at baseline: 6–12wk prior intervention (T0), second baseline: first session (T1), 4wk after beginning the intervention (T2), 8wk after beginning the intervention (T3), 12wk after the intervention, the final assessment (T4).

Outcome Measures: The Aggression Questionnaire (AQ-12), State-Trait Anger and Expression Inventory (STAXI-2), Multidimensional Anger Reaction Scale (MARS).

1.        AQ-12 scores significantly improved from TI to T4 (p = 0.01).

2.        All STAXI-2 subscales showed significant improvement from T1 to T4 (p < 0.01).

3.        MARS subscales of rumination and

venting showed significant improvement from T1 to T4 (p = 0.01; p = 0.04). Other subscales were non-significant (p > 0.05).

Medd & Tate

(2000)

Australia

RCT

PEDro=5

N=16

Population: TBI; Gender: Male=14, Female=2. Treatment Group (n=8): Mean Age=35.88yr; Mean Time Post Injury=37.25mo; Waitlist Group (n=8): Mean Age=34yr; Mean Time Post Injury=74.25mo.

Intervention: Participants were randomly allocated to either the treatment group or the waitlist group. The treatment group received 5-8 individualized sessions of cognitive behavioural therapy based on the Commonwealth Rehabilitation Service Anger Management Program.

Outcome Measure: State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Self-Esteem Inventories (SEI), Patient Competency Rating Scale (PCRS).

1.          The treatment group had significantly higher pre-intervention levels of Anger Expression-Out (AX-O) on the STAXI than the waitlist group (p=0.004).

2.          The treatment group showed a greater improvement in AX-O (p=0.006) and trait anger (p=0.054) from pre to post treatment when compared to the waitlist group.

3.          No significant differences were found on HADS, SEI, or PCRS between groups.

Aboulafia-Brakha et al.

(2013)

Switzerland

Pre-Post

NInitial=10, NFinal=9

Population: TBI; Median Age=47yr; Gender: Male=8, Female=2; Median Time Post Injury=27.5mo; Median GCS=5.

Intervention: Participants completed a semi-structured group treatment program for the management of anger and aggressiveness (1 hr, 1 day/wk for 8wk). The program was based on a cognitive behavioural therapy framework as led by a therapist. Inter-session homework was encouraged to apply new strategies. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, immediately after treatment, and at 4-5mo follow-up.

Outcome Measure: Buss and Perry Aggression Questionnaire (AQ-12), UPPS Impulsive Behaviour Scale (UPPS-P), Frontal System Behavioural Scale (FrSBe), Cambridge Behaviour Scale (EQ), Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS), Quality of Life Assessment (SF-36).

1.        Significant improvement in feelings of aggression on AQ-12 was found from baseline to follow-up (p=0.02).

2.          No significant improvement on AQ-12 was found from baseline to post treatment (p=0.84) or from post treatment to follow-up (p=0.57).

3.          No significant improvements were found for UPPS-P, FrSBe, EQ, HADS, or SF-36 between baseline and post treatment (p>0.05).

Hart et al.

(2012)

USA

Pre-Post

N=10

Population: TBI; Mean Age=43.3yr; Gender: Male=8, Female=2; Range of Time Post Injury=6-243mo; Range of Injury Severity: Moderate to Severe.

Intervention: 8 sessions that consisted of self-monitoring training to build awareness of anger problem and training of specific problem solving skills (anger self-management training).

Outcome Measure: State Trait Anger Expression Inventory 2 (STAXI-2), Brief Anger-Aggression Questionnaire (BAAQ).

1.          Following the intervention, there were significant reductions on self-reported STAXI-2 Trait Anger (p=0.02), STAXI-2 Anger Expression-Out (p=0.002), and BAAQ (p=0.01).

2.          There were no significant improvements on STAXI-2 or BAAQ as rated by a significant other.

Walker et al.

(2010)

Australia

Pre-Post

N=52

Population: TBI; Mean Age=32.3yr; Gender: Male=40, Female=12; Mean Time Post Injury=4.1yr; Injury Severity: Severe.

Intervention: Participants received 2hr sessions of group-based CBT focused on anger management, 1 x/wk for 12wk. Assessments were conducted at baseline, 12wk, and 3-16mo follow-up.

Outcome Measure: State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI).

1.          At post treatment, there were significant reductions in trait anger (p=0.002), anger expression-out (p=0.003), and anger control (p=0.005), but not in state anger or anger expression-in.

2.          At follow-up (n=31), the improvements from baseline were maintained, but there were no further improvements from post treatment.

O’Leary

(2000)

USA

Pre-Post

N=5

Population: ABI; Age Range=21-42yr; Gender: Male=5, Female=0; Time Post Injury Range=4 mo-5 yr.

Intervention: Patients attended a 10wk training cognitive behavioural therapy program for anger management and coping skills through the use of written materials, audiotapes, lectures, role-play, and group discussions.

Outcome Measure: Frequency of aggression.

1.          Training reduced the number of incidents of both verbal and physical aggression for all participants.

Feeney & Ylvisaker

(1995)

USA

Case Series

N=3

Population: TBI; Mean Age=18.3yr; Injury Severity: Severe.

Intervention: Patients received antecedent interventions, comprised of photographic and written cues, for managing aggression.

Outcome Measure: Aberrant Behaviour Checklist (ABC).

1.          All three patients showed a decrease in aggressive behaviours and ABC ratings indicated decreased intensity.

2.          Two patients showed a mild increase in aggressive behaviours with written cues, which decreased when substituted with photographic cues.

Burke et al.

(1988)

USA

Pre-Post

N=5

Population: TBI; Mean Age=23.2yr; Gender: Male=5, Female=0.

Intervention: Patients received behaviour therapy, with emphasis on reinforcement and antecedent conditions, for managing aggression.

Outcome Measure: Frequency of aggression.

1.          Measurements showed a 97% decrease in aggressive behaviour from baseline levels at 1wk and 100% at 3 wk.

2.          There was a significant reduction in behaviour at all time-points compared to baseline (p<0.001).

3.          No incidents of aggression were recorded during a 6mo follow-up.

PEDro=Physiotherapy Evidence Database rating scale (Moseley et al. 2002).