Select Page

Table 10.3 Phenytoin versus Levetiracetam for Seizure Prophylaxis

Author, Year Country Study Design Sample Size Methods Outcome
Younus et al. (2018) Pakistan RCT PEDro= 6 N = 140 Population: Phenytoin Group (N=69): Mean GCS=11.23. Levetiracetam group (N=73): Mean GCS=11.17. Overall: 117 males, 23 females; Mean Age=29.48±16.24y Treatment: TBI patients admitted to the hospital were randomized into the phenytoin or levetiracetam groups. The first dose of medication was given within 24h of injury. Both groups received medication for 7 days. No statistical differences between groups at baseline Outcomes:  Abnormal EEG (EEGs were completed the 1st day post trauma and on day 7 of treatment), Seizure activity (7-10 days), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). 1.        The number of abnormal EEGs was found to be significantly different between the two groups (p=0.002); the levetiracetam group had fewer individuals with abnormal EEG. 2.        The amount of seizure activity at follow-up was significantly different between groups (p=0.014); the levetiracetam group had fewer instances of seizures. 3.        There was no significant difference between GCS scores at follow-up between the two groups.
Szaflarski et al. (2010) USA RCT PEDro=8 N=52                   Steinbaugh et al. (2012) USA Addition to Szaflarski et al. 2010 RCT Population: TBI=46; SAH=6; Phenytoin group (PHT; n=18): Mean Age=35yr; Gender: Male=13, Female=5; Mean GCS=4. Levetiracetam group (LEV; n=34): Mean Age=44yr; Gender: Male=26, Female=8; Mean GCS=5. Treatment: Patients were randomized within 24h of injury. Patients received either a loading dose of intravenous PHT 20mg/kg, then 5mg/kg/d or intravenous LEV at 20mg/kg, and then 1000mg every 12hr for 7d. Outcome Measure: Occurrence of early seizures, Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), GOS-Extended (GOSE), Disability Rating Scale (DRS), Resource Utilization Questionnaire.       Addition: Patients received continuous video EEG (cEEG) for up to 72h which was compared to the outcomes collected. 1.        There were no significant differences in the occurrence of early seizures between the PHT and LEV groups (3 versus 5, p=1.0) 2.        There were no significant between-group differences in GOS at discharge (p=0.33) and 6mo post-discharge (p=0.89). 3.        There were no significant differences in the occurrence of fever, increased intracranial pressure, stroke, hypotension, arrhythmia, renal/ liver abnormalities or death between the two groups (p>0.15 for all). 4.        Compared to the LEV group, those in the PHT group experienced a significant worsening of their neurological status more often (p=0.024), and experienced anemia less often (p=0.076). 5.        Compared to PHT group, the LEV group showed significantly lower DRS at 3 and 6mo (p=0.006 and p=0.037), and higher GOSE at 6mo (p=0.016) in patients who survived. 6.        The presence of focal slowing, epileptiform discharges, and seizures were not predictive of outcome (GOS-E, DRS). More severe slowing was positively associated with DRS and negatively associated with GOS-E at discharge, 3 and 6 mo.
Khan et al. (2016) Pakistan Cohort N=154 Population: TBI; Mean Age=24.15yr; Gender: Males=115, Females=29; Mean GCS: 59.1% (8-13), 40.9% (3-7). Treatment: Group A received phenytoin (5 mg/kg/day), group B received levetiracetam (10-20 mg/kg/day). Outcome Measure: Incidence of post-traumatic seizures, efficacy of drug on moderate vs severe TBIs. 1.        There were no significant differences between treatment groups in terms of the incidence of post-traumatic seizures. 2.        There was no significant difference in how each drug impacted moderate vs severe TBI and seizure rates.
Javed et al. (2016) Pakistan Cohort N=100 Population: TBI; Group 1 (n=50): Mean Age=31.16yr. Group 2 (n=50): Mean Age=34.96. Treatment: Group 1: given IV phenytoin load then switched to enteral levetiracetam (35 mg/kg/dose three times daily) by 72h. Group 2: given IV phenytoin load then kept on phenytoin during the same time period. Outcome Measure: Incidence of post-traumatic seizures as measured by EEG (patients with clinical seizure, mental state change or deep coma underwent EEG). 1.        There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups in terms of the number patients who had post-traumatic seizures.
Radic et al. (2014) USA Case Control N=288 Population: Subdural Hematoma; Levetiracetam group (LEV; n=164): Mean Age=65.96yr; Gender: Male=98, Female=66; Mean GCS=13.5. Phenytoin group (PHT; n=124): Mean Age=62yr; Gender: Male=85, Female=39; Mean GCS=12.7. Treatment: Patients were retrospectively analyzed. Those who received LEV were compared to those who received PHT for seizure prophylaxis. Outcome Measure: Seizure rate and adverse drug events. 1.        There was no significant difference between LEV and PHT in clinical or electrographic seizure risk for patients without a midline shift. 2.        In subjects with midline shift >0 mm, LEV was associated with an increased risk of electrographic seizures during hospitalization (p=0.028) and a decreased risk of adverse drug effects (p=0.001), compared with PHT use.
Gabriel & Rowe (2014) USA Cohort N=19 Population: TBI; Phenytoin Group (PHT, n=14): Mean Age=46.8yr; Gender: Male=10, Female=4; Mean GCS=3. Levetiracetam Group (LEV, n=5): Mean Age=48.8yr; Gender: Male=3, Female=2; Mean GCS=14. Treatment: Participants were divided based on prophylactic treatment: PHT or LEV. Follow-up interview conducted. Outcome Measure: Glasgow Outcome Scale- Extended (GOS-E) >/= 6mos post-injury administered by telephone, occurrence of early and late seizures, medication-related complications. 1.        The LEV group had a statistically higher median GCS at presentation (p=0.016) and ICU discharge (p=0.044), compared to the PHT group. The PHT group, compared to the LEV group, had a longer period of time between injury and GOS-E assessment (808.8 versus 484.4d, p=0.001). 2.        There was no significant difference in the mean GOS-E scores at follow-up (PHT 5.07 versus LEV 5.60, p=0.58). 3.        There was no significant difference between groups for occurrence of early or late seizures (both p=0.53). 4.        Compared to the PHT group, the LEV group was significantly less likely to experience medication-related complications (p=0.038); the PHT group had a significantly higher rate of days with fever (p=0.014).
Inaba et al. (2013) USA Prospective Controlled Trial N=813 Population: TBI; Levetiracetam Group (LEV, n=406): Mean Age=51.7yr; Gender: Male=300, Female=106; Mean GCS=12.1. Phenytoin Group (PHT, n=407): Mean Age=53.6yr; Gender: Male=280, Female=127; Mean GCS=12.6. Treatment: Participants were administered either LEV at 1000mg every 12h or PHT. In the PHT group the loading dose was 20mg/kg then 5mg/kg/d every 8h. Treatment lasted 7d. Outcome Measure: Seizure occurrence. 1.        There was no significant difference in seizure rates between groups (1.5% versus 1.5%, p=0.997). 2.        There were no significant differences between groups (LEV vs. PHT) in terms of adverse drug reactions (7.9% versus 10.3%, p=0.227), complications (28.3% versus 27.0%, p=0.679) or mortality rates (5.4% versus 3.7%, p=0.236).
Kruer et al. (2013) USA Retrospective Cohort N=109 Population: TBI; Median GCS=5. Phenytoin Group (PHT, n=89): Median Age=43.1yr; Gender: Male=76, Female=13. Levetiracetam Group (LEV, n=20): Median Age=34.1yr; Gender: Male=19, Female=1. Treatment: Retrospective review of patients administered PHT or LEV. Outcome Measure: Occurrence of early seizures. 1.        One patient from each group seized in the first 7d (p=0.335). 2.        Hospital length of stay did not differ significantly between groups (median days, LEV 26.5 versus PHT 11, p=0.134).
Jones et al. (2008) USA Cohort N=27 Population: Severe TBI; Gender: Male=20, Female=7. Treatment: Patients received levetiracetam (n=15; 500mg IV every 12h for 7d) administered within 24hr of injury and were compared to a retrospective cohort of patients who received phenytoin (n=12). Outcome Measure: Occurrence of early seizures. 1.        There was a significant difference in the occurrence of abnormal EEG findings (seizure or seizure tendency with epileptiform activity) between groups (p= 0.003), with the levetiracetam group having more abnormal findings. 2.        There was no significant difference between groups for actual seizures (p=0.556).